logo
Volume 7, Issue 1 (2018)                   J Police Med 2018, 7(1) | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.30505/7.1.19
‎ 20.1001.1.22286241.1396.7.1.6.1

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ghazanfari E, Kazemnejad A, Gholami Fesharaki M. Affecting Factors on Marital Attitude Pattern in Police Staff; Path Analysis Model . J Police Med 2018; 7 (1)
URL: http://jpmed.ir/article-1-623-en.html
Affecting Factors on Marital Attitude Pattern in Police Staff; Path Analysis Model
Elahe Ghazanfari1, Anoshirvan Kazemnejad *2, Mohammad Gholami Fesharaki1
1- 1Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran , Kazem_an@modares.ac.ir
English Extended Abstract:   (4212 Views)

Abstract
Aims: Marriage attitude is a cognitive phenomenon that has a considerable influence on willingness to get married, age when married and the stability of marriage. This study was done with the aim of exploration affecting factors on marriage attitude pattern.
Instrument & Methods: This cross sectional study was done with using two-stage cluster sampling in year 2015-2016, on 750 Tehran, Iran, police personnel. Self-made questionnaire on marital attitude was used to data collection. Data was analyzed using factor analysis Spearman correlation coefficient and path analysis in SPSS 23 and AMOS 23.
Findings: The number of siblings, work experience and the ideal number of children indicators had a positive significant correlation and the ideal age had a significant negative correlation with the marital attitude. The correlation between age and economic situation indicators with marital attitude was not significant (p>0.05). The goodness of fit index with values of RMSEA=0.00, GFI=0.99, NFI=0.99 and CMIN/DF=0.73, showed that the path model is suitable. In the path analysis test it was determined that gender, the ideal age for marriage and the number of siblings had direct effects and age, years of work experience, the ideal number of children and the economic situation had indirect effects on marital attitude.
Conclusion: Creating the culture of having more children in the family, stabilize the employment situation and having appropriate work experience increase attitudes toward marriage.  
 

Keywords: Attitude [MeSH], Marriage [MeSH], Police [MeSH]
Full-Text [PDF 533 kb]   (1565 Downloads)    
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey | Subject: Police Medicine Management
Received: 2017/05/7 | Accepted: 2017/10/31 | Published: 2017/12/24
English Expanded Abstract [HTML 19 KB]  (150 Download)
References
1. Mohammadi A, Khojastehmehr R, Abbas Pour Z, Tabeh L. A qualitative exploration of married students attitudes toward marriage. Int J Life Sci. 2016;10(1):51-7. [Link] [DOI:10.3126/ijls.v10i1.14511]
2. Simon, RW, Marcussen K. Marital transitions, marital beliefs and mental health. J Health Soc Behav. 1999;40(2):111-25 [Link] [DOI:10.2307/2676367] [PMID]
3. Kazemipour S. Measuring the attitude of young people towards marriage and recognizing its effects and consequences, with emphasis on university student marriages. Farhang Dar Daneshgah-E-Eslami. 2009;13(2):113-7. [Persian] [Link]
4. Salsali M, Rezaee N, Seyedfatemi N, Rahnavard Z. Perception of iranian middle-aged women regarding moral health concept: A content analysis. Glob J Health Sci. 2014;7(3):267-73. [Link] [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v7n3p267] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Risch SC, Jodl KM, Eccles JS. Role of the father‐adolescent relationship in shaping adolescents' attitudes toward divorce. J Marriage Fam. 2004;66(1):46-58. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00004.x]
6. Freeman H, Brown BB. Primary attachment to parents and peers during adolescence: differences by attachment style. J Youth Adolesc. 2001;30(6):653-74. [Link] [DOI:10.1023/A:1012200511045]
7. Segrin C, Taylor ME, Altman J. Social cognitive mediators and relational outcomes associated with parental divorce. J Soc Pers Relatsh. 2005;22(3):361-77. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0265407505052441]
8. Shapurian R, Hojat M. Sexual and premarital attitudes of Iranian college students. Psychol Reports. 1985;57(1):67-74. [Link] [DOI:10.2466/pr0.1985.57.1.67]
9. Kazemnejad A, Gholami Fesharaki M, Gilani N. The study of knowledge, attitude and marriage expectation in Tehran police single staff. J Police Med. 2016;5(3):197-204. [Persian] [Link]
10. Chow N, Lum T. Trends in family attitudes and values in Hong Kong. Final Report Submitted to Central Policy Unit Hong Kong SAR Government; 2008. Avaialble from: https://goo.gl/FE2rHG [Link]
11. Dasgupta I, Maitra P, Mukherjee D, 'Arranged'marriage, co-residence and female schooling: a model with evidence from India. In: Mukhopadhyay H, editor. Dimensions of Economic Theory and Policy. Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2011. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198073970.003.0020]
12. Waller MR, McLanahan SS. "His" and "her" marriage expectations: determinants and consequences. J Marriage Fam. 2005;67(1):53-67. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00005.x]
13. Ravadrad A, Nayebi H. Gender analysis of perceived (expected) and performed roles of women in family. Woman Dev Politics (Women Res). 2007;5(1):27-58. [Persian] [Link]
14. Barikani A, Ebrahim SM, Navid M. The cause of divorce among men and women referred to marriage and legal office in Qazvin, Iran. Glob J Health Sci. 2012;4(5):184-191. [Link] [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v4n5p184]
15. Torabi F, Baschieri A, Clarke L, Abbasi‐Shavazi MJ. Marriage postponement in Iran: accounting for socio‐economic and cultural change in time and space. Popul Space Place. 2013;19(3):258-74. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/psp.1710]
16. Knox D, Zusman ME, Daniels VW. College student attitudes toward interreligious marriage. Coll Stud J. 2002;36(1):84-6. [Link]
17. Riggio HR, Weiser DA. Attitudes toward marriage: embeddedness and outcomes in personal relationships. Pers Relatsh. 2008;15(1):123-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00188.x]
18. Dillon HN. Family violence and divorce: effects on marriage expectations [dissertation]. Tennessee: East Tennessee State University; 2005. [Link]
19. Erickson MJ, Carlson T. Spirituality and family therapy. Abingdon: Routledge; 2014. [Link]
20. Schoen R, Cheng YH. Partner choice and the differential retreat from marriage. J Marriage Fam. 2006;68(1):1-10. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00229.x]
21. Strong B, DeVault C, Cohen T. The marriage and family experience: intimate relationships in a changing society. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2007. [Link]
22. Stevenson B, Wolfers J. Marriage and divorce: changes and their driving forces. J Econ Perspect. 2007;21(2):27-52. [Link] [DOI:10.1257/jep.21.2.27]
23. Wise RA, King AR. Family environment as a predictor of the quality of college students' friendships. J Fam Issue. 2008;29(6):828-48. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0192513X07309461]
24. Stone MK, Hutchinson RL. Familial conflict and attitudes toward marriage: a psychological wholeness perspective. J Divorce Remarriage. 1993;18(3-4):79-91. [Link] [DOI:10.1300/J087v18n03_05]
25. Klein HK. Investigation of variables influencing college students' marital attitudes and fear of intimacy [dissertation]. Muncie: Ball State University; 2005. [Link]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.