نشریه علمی پژوهشی طب انتظامی Journal of Police Medicine
Volume 12, Issue 1 (2023)
J Police Med 2023, 12(1) |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.BMSU.REC.1400.057
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kalhor L, Ebadi A, Mokhtari Nouri J, Nehrir B. Obstacles and Solutions of Family Participation in Intensive Care Unit: Qualitative Content Analysis. J Police Med 2023; 12 (1) : e22
URL: http://jpmed.ir/article-1-1221-en.html
URL: http://jpmed.ir/article-1-1221-en.html
Obstacles and Solutions of Family Participation in Intensive Care Unit: Qualitative Content Analysis
1- Research Center for Cognitive & Behavioral Sciences in Police, Directorate of Health, Rescue & Treatment, Police Headquarter, Tehran, Iran
2- Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life style institute, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Medicine, Quran and Hadith Research Center, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Health Management Research Center of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
2- Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life style institute, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Medicine, Quran and Hadith Research Center, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Health Management Research Center of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
English Extended Abstract: (114 Views)
Aims: The basis of family-centered care is the participation of patients and their families in health decisions. Despite the advantages of family involvement in intensive care, this method is associated with many obstacles. Therefore, the present study aimed to explain the obstacles and suggested solutions for family participation in the ICU.
Materials and Methods: This qualitative study of contract content analysis was conducted in Tehran in 1402. The tools for collecting experiences were open questions and semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used to identify the participants. The selection of samples was done by observing the principle of maximum diversity to achieve a diverse range of experiences. Sampling continued until information saturation, with no formation of classes and subclasses and new information. Qualitative data analysis was performed using the four stages of content analysis of Elo and Kyngäs (2008). Lincoln and Guba's four acceptability criteria were used to strengthen the results.
Findings: In this study, 15 participants, including four family members of patients, four nurses, and seven managers of the studied hospital with an average age of 49.53±12.09 years and an average years of service of 16.73±10.22 years participated. The results consisted of four classes: barriers related to the family, barriers related to the treatment team, barriers related to the physical structure of the department, and organizational barriers; 13 subclasses and 21 codes were formed.
Conclusion: Using solutions such as holding training workshops on communication skills with patients and families, anger control methods, and allocating funds to create favorable changes in the physical space of the ICU and providing nurses can help effectively implement this approach
Materials and Methods: This qualitative study of contract content analysis was conducted in Tehran in 1402. The tools for collecting experiences were open questions and semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used to identify the participants. The selection of samples was done by observing the principle of maximum diversity to achieve a diverse range of experiences. Sampling continued until information saturation, with no formation of classes and subclasses and new information. Qualitative data analysis was performed using the four stages of content analysis of Elo and Kyngäs (2008). Lincoln and Guba's four acceptability criteria were used to strengthen the results.
Findings: In this study, 15 participants, including four family members of patients, four nurses, and seven managers of the studied hospital with an average age of 49.53±12.09 years and an average years of service of 16.73±10.22 years participated. The results consisted of four classes: barriers related to the family, barriers related to the treatment team, barriers related to the physical structure of the department, and organizational barriers; 13 subclasses and 21 codes were formed.
Conclusion: Using solutions such as holding training workshops on communication skills with patients and families, anger control methods, and allocating funds to create favorable changes in the physical space of the ICU and providing nurses can help effectively implement this approach
Article number: e22
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Police Health
Received: 2023/10/1 | Accepted: 2023/12/18 | Published: 2023/12/27
Received: 2023/10/1 | Accepted: 2023/12/18 | Published: 2023/12/27
References
1. Arofiati F, Apriliyanti P. The family satisfaction on nursing services at the intensive care unit. J Med Sci. 2021;9(T4):61-4. [DOI:10.3889/oamjms.2021.5776]
2. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Arich C, Brivet F, Brun F, et al. Family participation in care to the critically ill: Opinions of families and staff. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:1498-504. [DOI:10.1007/s00134-003-1904-y] [PMID]
3. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-1904-y [DOI:10.1007/s00134-003-1904-y] [PMID]
4. Park M, Chesla C. Understanding complexity of Asian American family care practices. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2010;24(3):189-201 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnu.2009.06.005 [DOI:10.1016/j.apnu.2009.06.005] [PMID]
5. van Beusekom I, Bakhshi-Raiez F, de Keizer NF, Dongelmans DA, van der Schaaf M. Reported burden on informal caregivers of ICU survivors: a literature review. Critic Care. 2016;20:16. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1185-9 [DOI:10.1186/s13054-016-1185-9] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Dehghan Nayeri N, Mohammadi S, Pedram Razi S, Kazemnejad A. Adherence of family caregivers of patients with stroke to rehabilitation regimen. Hayat. 2012;18(1):30-41. http://hayat.tums.ac.ir/article-1-36-en.html
7. Gerritsen RT, Hartog CS, Curtis JR. New developments in the provision of family-centered care in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(4):550-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28124085/ [DOI:10.1007/s00134-017-4684-5] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Mitchell ML, Kean S, Rattray JE, Hull AM, Davis C, Murfield JE, et al. A family intervention to reduce delirium in hospitalised ICU patients: A feasibility randomised controlled trial. Intensive Critic Care Nurs. 2017;77-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.01.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2017.01.001] [PMID]
9. Goldfarb MJ, Bibas L, Bartlett V, Jones H, Khan N. Outcomes of patient- and family-centered care interventions in the ICU: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Critic Care Med. 2017;45(10):1751-61.
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002624 [DOI:10.1097/ccm.0000000000002624] [PMID]
10. Nehrir B, Ebadi A, Mokhtari Nouri J, Nehrir B. Family-Centered Care Approach: A Systematic Review Study. Journal of Police Medicine. 2022;11(1):1-19.
11. Hupcey JE, Penrod J. Concept analysis: examining the state of the science. Res Theory Nurs pract. 2005;19(2):197-208. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16025698/#:~:text=The%20authors%20argue%20that%20concept,is%20known%20about%20the%20concept. [DOI:10.1891/rtnp.19.2.197.66801] [PMID]
12. Heyland DK, Davidson J, Skrobik Y, des Ordons AR, Van Scoy LJ, Day AG, et al. Improving partnerships with family members of ICU patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19(1):3. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2379-4 [DOI:10.1186/s13063-017-2379-4] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Ghaffari M, Esmali A, Mohammadi R. The Mediating Role of Family Communication Patterns in the Relationshipbetween Emotional Maturity and Self-Compassion with Vulnerability to Stress in Soldiers. Journal of Police Medicine. 2021;10(4):287-92. DOI: 10.30505/10.4.287
14. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107-15. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x] [PMID]
15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x] [PMID]
16. Mirlashari J, Sadeghi T, Sagheb S, Khanmohammadzadeh T. Nurses' and physicians' Perspective about Barriers to Implement Family Centered Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units. Iran J Nurs. 2015;28(93):140-50. DOI: 10.29252/ijn.28.93.94.140 [DOI:10.29252/ijn.28.93.94.140]
17. Coyne I, Murphy M, Costello T, O'Neill C, Donnellan C. A Survey of Nurses' Practices and Perceptions of Family-Centered Care in Ireland. J Fam Nurs. 2013;19. [DOI:10.1177/1074840713508224] [PMID]
18. DOI: 10.1177/1074840713508224. [DOI:10.1177/1074840713508224] [PMID]
19. Vasli P, Salsali M, Tatarpoor P. Perspectives of nurses on barriers of parental participation in pediatric care. J Hayat. 2012;18(3):22-32. http://hayat.tums.ac.ir/article-1-20-en.html
20. Laudert S, Liu WF, Blackington S, Perkins B, Martin S, Macmillan-York E, et al. Implementing potentially better practices to support the neurodevelopment of infants in the NICU. J Perinatol. 2007;27 Suppl 2:S75-93. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211843. [DOI:10.1038/sj.jp.7211843] [PMID]
21. Leon AM, Knapp S. Involving family systems in critical care nursing: challenges and opportunities. Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCN. 2008;27(6):255-62.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DCC.0000338866.47164.6d [DOI:10.1097/01.dcc.0000338866.47164.6d] [PMID]
22. Davidson JE. Family-centered care: meeting the needs of patients' families and helping families adapt to critical illness. Crit Care Nurs. 2009;29(3):28-34. DOI: 10.4037/ccn2009611 [DOI:10.4037/ccn2009611] [PMID]
23. Marco L, Bermejillo I, Garayalde N, Sarrate I, Margall MA, Asiain MC. Intensive care nurses' beliefs and attitudes towards the effect of open visiting on patients, family and nurses. Nurs Crit Care. 2006;11(1):33-41. [DOI:10.1111/j.1362-1017.2006.00148.x] [PMID]
24. Azimi Lolaty H, Bagheri-Nesami M, Shorofi S, Golzarodi T, Charati J. The effects of family-friend visits on anxiety, physiological indices and well-being of MI patients admitted to a coronary care unit. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2014;20(3):147-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2014.03.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2014.03.002] [PMID]
25. Blom H, Gustavsson C, Sundler AJ. Participation and support in intensive care as experienced by close relatives of patients: a phenomenological study. Intensiv Crit Care Nurs. 2013;29(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2012.04.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2012.04.002] [PMID]
26. Mosqueda R, Castilla Y, Perapoch J, Lora D, López-Maestro M, Pallás C. Necessary resources and barriers perceived by professionals in the implementation of the NIDCAP. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89(9):649-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.04.011] [PMID]
27. McKiel E. Impact of Organizational Restructuring on Nurses' Facilitation of Parental Participatory Care. Can J Nurs Leadersh. 2002;15:14-7. [DOI:10.12927/cjnl.2002.19136] [PMID]
28. DOI: 10.12927/cjnl.2002.19136 [DOI:10.12927/cjnl.2002.19136] [PMID]
29. Farsi Z, dehghan nayeri N, Negarandeh R, Broomand S. Nursing profession in Iran: An overview of opportunities and challenges. Jpn J Nursing Sci. 2010;7:9-1. [DOI:10.1111/j.1742-7924.2010.00137.x] [PMID]
30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7924.2010.00137.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1742-7924.2010.00137.x] [PMID]
31. Nikbakht Nasrabadi A, Lipson J, Emami A. Professional nursing in Iran: An overview of its historical and sociocultural framework. J Prof Nurs. 2004;20:396-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.08.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.08.004] [PMID]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |