logo
Volume 12, Issue 1 (2023)                   J Police Med 2023, 12(1) | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.UMA.REC.1401.045


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rezaei sharif A, Taghizadeh hir S, Fattahzadeh Ardalani G. The Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Improving Cognitive Abilities in Martial Athletes. J Police Med 2023; 12 (1) : e3
URL: http://jpmed.ir/article-1-1144-en.html
1- Department of Counseling, Faculty of Educational Sciences & Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran, ardabil
2- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences & Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran , sara.taghizadeh1370@gmail.com
3- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Science, Ardabil, Iran
English Extended Abstract:   (1028 Views)
 Aims: Improving cognitive abilities in athletes may increase their performance and predict success in competition. Therefore, investigating methods such as Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation that targets brain structures can be important. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in improving cognitive abilities in Martial Athletes.
Materials and Methods: The research method was semi-experimental with a pretest-posttest design and control group, conducted on all martial athletes of Ardabil in Iran in 2022. Thirty people were selected from the martial athletes of Ardabil city and members of the Shahid Abbasi sports club using the available sampling methods and randomly assigned to the experimental and control group (15 people in each group). Transcranial electrical stimulation (tDCS) was implemented in 10 sessions, each lasting 20 minutes, but the control group received no training. Nejati Cognitive Abilities Questionnaire (2013) was used in two stages, pre-test and post-test, to collect data. Data analysis was done using multivariate covariance analysis in SPSS 23 software.
Findings: Thirty people participated in this research, and all participants were male. The average age of the participants in the experimental group was 25.33±4.53 years and in the control group was 24.26±4.97 years. Also, in the experimental group, two people (13.30%) had a diploma, nine people (60.00%) had a bachelor's degree, and four people (26.70%) had a master's degree. In the control group, three people (20.00 percent) had a diploma, seven people (46.70 percent) had a bachelor's degree, and five people (33.30 percent) had a master's degree. Descriptive statistics of the research variables in the pre-test stage showed that the average scores of cognitive abilities in the experimental and control groups were almost equal and did not differ much in the experimental and control groups. However, the post-test results showed that the experimental group's average scores of cognitive abilities improved compared to the control group (Table 1).
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to check the normality of the distribution of variable scores. Considering that the significance level in the research variables was more than 0.05, the data distribution was normal, and normality tests were used. Also, according to the Box's M test, the equality of the covariance matrix of the dependent variables between the experimental and control groups was not significant (p>0.05). The results of Levene's test to check the homogeneity of error variances of the variables in the research groups were not significant for cognitive ability variables (p>0.05). In other words, the error variances of these variables were homogeneous in the groups. The results of multivariate covariance analysis showed that based on the figures obtained after adjusting the pre-test scores, there was a significant effect in the factor between the subjects of the group in working memory (F=8.23; p=0.01), selective attention (F=45.73; p=0.00), making a decision (F=25.60; p=0.03), planning (F=38.08; p=0.00), sustained attention (F=24.27; p=0.00) p), social cognition (F=54.76; p=0.01) and cognitive flexibility (F=11.07; p=60.00) and the average scores of the experimental group improved significantly (Table 2 ).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is an effective method for improving the cognitive abilities of martial artists. Therefore, specialists and psychologists can use this non-invasive method as a less invasive and accessible method to improve the cognitive abilities of these people along with other interventions.
CLINICAL & PRACTICAL TIPS in POLICE MEDICINE: According to the current research on the effectiveness of electrical stimulation of the brain in improving the cognitive abilities of martial athletes, such interventions can be used in military forces, especially martial arts workers.
Acknowledgments: The authors appreciate the subjects who participated in this research and the efforts that helped us achieve the research results.
CONFLICT of INTEREST: The authors of the article state that there is no conflict of interest in this study.
AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION: First author, presentation of the idea and study design, data collection and interpretation; Second and third authors, data collection and interpretation. All the authors participated in the initial writing of the article, and all accept the responsibility for the accuracy and correctness of the contents of the present article with the final approval of the present article.
FUNDING SOURCES: The present research had no financial support.

 
Table 1) Average of subscales of cognitive abilities in
pre-test and post-test of experimental and control groups
Subscales Experimental groups
(15=n)
control groups
(15=n)
pre-test (M±SD) post-test (M±SD) pre-test
(M±SD)
post-test (M±SD)
Memory 10.66±1.23 7.66±1.63 10.13±1.40 10.13±1.45
selective attention 21.00±0.84 17.80±1.01 21.13±01.24 20.66±1.29
Decision making 15.00±0.84 12.06±1.27 14.46±1.12 14.20±1.01
planning 9.06±0.88 6.93±0.88 9.00±1.00 8.73±0.88
Sustained attention 11.73±1.03 8.73±1.22 11.20±0.86 10.93±0.70
Social cognition 9.53±1.83 12.66±1.29 9.20±0.86 9.40±1.22
flexibility 8.53±0.91 6.66±1.29 8.53±1.12 8.53±1.44

Table 2) The results of covariance analysis related to
 the scores of the two groups in cognitive abilities
Variable Source of changes Total of squares Degrees of freedom Mean square F p Eta
Working memory pre-exam 2.13 1 2.13 1.21 0.27 0.04
group 45.63 1 45.63 19.05 0.01 0.40
error 49.06 28 1.75 - - -
Selective attention pre-exam 0.13 1 0.13 0.11 0.73 0.004
group 61.63 1 61.63 45.73 0.001 0.62
error 31.73 28 1.13 - - -
Decision making pre-exam 2.13 1 2.13 2.15 0.15 0.07
group 34.13 1 34.13 25.60 0.03 0.47
error 27.73 28 0.99 - - -
Planning pre-exam 0.03 1 0.03 0.37 0.84 0.00
group 24.30 1 24.30 38.08 0.001 0.57
error 24.93 28 0.89 - - -
Sustained attention pre-exam 2.13 1 2.13 2.35 0.13 0.07
group 36.30 1 36.30 24.27 0.001 0.46
error 25.33 28 0.90 - - -
Social cognition pre-exam 0.83 1 0.83 1.15 0.29 0.04
group 80.03 1 80.03 54.76 0.01 0.66
error 20.13 28 0.71 - - -
Cognitive flexibility pre-exam 0.13 1 0.13 0.12 0.72 0.00
group 20.83 1 20.83 11.07 0.001 0.28
error 29.06 28 1.03 - - -

  
Article number: e3
Full-Text [PDF 648 kb]   (920 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Police Related Psychology
Received: 2022/10/18 | Accepted: 2022/12/31 | Published: 2023/02/13

References
1. Sakamoto S, Takeuchi H, Ihara N, Ligao B, Suzukawa K. Possible requirement of executive functions for high performance in soccer. PLoS One. 2018;13: e0201871. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201871 [DOI:10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0201871] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Hsu C. L, Best JR, Davis JC, Nagamatsu LS, Wang S, Boyd L A, et al. Aerobic exercise promotes executive functions and impacts functional neural activity among older adults with vascular cognitive impairment. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(3):184-91. [DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096846] [PMID]
3. Ajilchi B, Rahmani J, Zoghi L. Predication of mindfulness based on cognitive abilities and its sub-components in NAJA university's students. J Police Med. 2019;8(2):93-8. http://jpmed.ir/files/site1/user_files_c1271c/ajilchi_b-A-10-864-1-2afe7b0.pdf
4. Nejati V .Cognitive abilities questionnaire: Development and evaluation of psychometric properties. Adv Cogn Sci 2013;15(2):11-9. https://icssjournal.ir/browse.php?a_id=289&sid=1&slc_lang=en
5. Scharfen HE, Memmert D. The relationship between cognitive functions and sport-specific motor skills in elite youth soccer players. Front Psychol. 2019;10:817-27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00817 [DOI:10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2019.00817] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Moran A, Campbell M, Toner J. Exploring the cognitive mechanisms of expertise in sport: progress and prospects. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;42:8-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.019]
7. Vestberg T, Reinebo G, Maurex, L, Ingvar M, Petrovic P. Core executive functions are associated with success in young elite soccer players. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170845. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170845] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Wagner H, Finkenzeller T, Würth S, von Duvillard S. P. Individual and team performance in team-handball: a review. J Sport Sci Med. 2014;13(4):808-16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25435773/
9. Williams AM, Ford P, Eccles DW, Ward P. Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport and its acquisition: implications for applied cognitive psychology. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2011;25(3): 432-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1710 [DOI:10.1002/acp.1710]
10. Verburgh L, Scherder EJ, van Lange PA, Oosterlaan J. Executive functioning in highly talented soccer players. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91254. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0091254] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Romanenko V, Podrigalo L, Cynarski W, Rovnaya, O, Korobeynikova L, Goloha V, Robak I. A comparative analysis of the short-term memory of martial arts' athletes of different level of sportsmanship. J Martial Anthropol. 2020;20(3):18-24. https://www.proquest.com/openview/72c8dce36d64eee7b0fa69e5d17ae403/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=5371637
12. Kazemi M, Casella C, Perri G. 2004 Olympic tae kwon do athlete profile. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2009;53(2):144-52. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2686035/
13. Piskorska E, Mieszkowski J, Kochanowicz A, Wędrowska E, Niespodziński B, Borkowska A. Mental skills in combat sports -review of methods anxiety evaluation. Archives of budo: health promotion and prevention 2016, 12(1):e11279. https://archbudo.com/view/abstract/id/11279
14. James LP, Haff GG, Kelly VG, & Beckman EM. Towards a determination of the physiological characteristics distinguishing successful mixed martial arts athletes: a systematic review of combat sport literature. Sports Med. 2016;46(10):1525-51. [DOI:10.1007/s40279-016-0493-1] [PMID]
15. Rinderer M, Bernero A. Mental skills training in martial arts. Dissertation. [Dublin] University Denver. 2017. 40p. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1242&context=capstone_masters
16. Bandeira ID, Guimarães RS, Jagersbacher JG, Barretto TL, de Jesus-Silva JR, Santos SN et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) a pilot study. J Child Neurol. 2016;31(7):918-24. [DOI:10.1177/0883073816630083] [PMID]
17. Rajaei Poor MS, & Saeed Manesh M. The effectiveness of transcutaneous direct brain electrical stimulation (TDCS) on the memory of students with special learning disorders. J Neuropsychol. 2018;4(13):67-84. [Persian]. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24765023.1397.4.13.5.9
18. Vicario CM, Salehinejad MA, Felmingham K, Martino G, Nitsche MA. A systematic review on the therapeutic effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of anxiety disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2019;96:219-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.012] [PMID]
19. Lefaucheur JP. A comprehensive database of published tDCS clinical trials (2005-2016). Neurophysiol Clin. 2016;46(6):319-98. [DOI:10.1016/j.neucli.2016.10.002] [PMID]
20. Mohajeri aval N, Narimani M, Sadeghi GH, Hajlou N. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on experiential avoidance and worry in people with general anxiety disorder. Feyz. 2019;23(4):371-9. [Persian]. https://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-3832-en.html
21. Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrgolz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3(3): CD009645. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009645.pub3 [DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd009645.pub3]
22. Taherifard M, Saeidmanesh M, Azizi M. The effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on the anxiety and severity of stuttering in adolescents aged 15 to 18. J Res Rehabil Sci. 2020;16:224-31. 10.22122/JRRS.V16I0.3605
23. Nouhi M, Shahlaee J, Honari H, Ghafouri F. The role of talent identification management in martial arts. New Trends Sport Manage. 2019;7(26):1-19. http://ntsmj.issma.ir/article-1-1134-en.html
24. Delavar A. Theoretical and practical foundations of research in humanities and social sciences. Roshd. 2015. [Persian]. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=fa&as_sdt=0,5&cluster=6743202502178855748
25. Mirzaei M, Hasani Abharian P, Meschi F, Sabet M. Effectiveness of combination therapy of computerized cognitive rehabilitation and transcranial direct current stimulation on the cognitive function in elderlies. EBNESINA. 2021;22(4):47-59. https://ebnesina.ajaums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=915&slc_lang=en&sid=1&printcase=1&hbnr=1&hmb=1
26. Mousavi SA, Jarareh J, Mohammadiarya AR. Effectiveness of Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) over the prefrontal cortex on cognitive function in the elderly with Alzheimer. Rooyesh. 2021;10(7):1-12. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2383353.1400.10.7.4.6
27. Ke Y, Wang N, Du J, Kong L, Liu S, Xu M, Ming D. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs) on working memory training in healthy young adults. Front. 2019;13:1-10. file:///C:/Users/1/Desktop/Downloads/fnhum-13-00019.pdf [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00019] [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Ciullo V, Spalletta G, Caltagirone C, Banaj N, Vecchio D, Piras F, Piras F. Transcranial direct current stimulation and cognition in neuropsychiatric disorders: systematic review of the evidence and future directions. Neuroscientist. 2021;27(3):285-309. [DOI:10.1177/1073858420936167] [PMID]
29. Cosmo C, DiBiasi M. Lima V, Grecco L, Collange M, MauroP et al. A systematic review of transcranial direct current stimulation effects in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Affect Dis. 2020;1(276):1-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.054] [PMID] [PMCID]
30. Breitling C, Zaehle T, DannhauerM, Tegelbeckers J, FlechtnerH & Krauel K. Comparison between conventional and HD-tDCS of the right inferior frontal gyrus in children and adolescents with ADHD. Clin Neurophysiol 2020;131(5):1146-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.12.412] [PMID] [PMCID]
31. Naji A, Rahimian Boger A, Hasani Tabatabai S. Comparing the effectiveness of schema therapy and transcranial stimulation of the brain with electric current on food craving. J Clin Psychol. 2020;12(2):18-9. [Persian]. [DOI:10.22075/jcp.2020.20089.1852]
32. Das N, Spence JS, Aslan S, Vanneste S, Mudar R, Rackley A et al. Cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment: A randomized pilot trial. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:307. [DOI:10.3389/fnins.2019.00307] [PMID] [PMCID]
33. Jung DH, Ahn SP, Pak ME, Lee JL, Jung YJ, Kim KB et al. Therapeutic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in a rat model of ADHD. Elife. 2020;9: e56359. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56359 [DOI:10.7554/elife.56359] [PMID] [PMCID]
34. Wong H, Zaman R. Neurostimulation in treating ADHD. Psychiatria Danubia 2019, 31(3): 265-275.
35. Anderson M. Prescription-strength gaming: ADHD treatment now comes in the form of a first-person racing game-[News]. IEEE Spectrum. 2020;57(8):9-10. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9150542 [DOI:10.1109/MSPEC.2020.9150542]
36. Dubreuil-Vall L, Gomez-Bernal F, Villegas A, Cirillo P, Surman C, Ruffini G et al. tDCS to the left DLPFC improves cognitive control but not action cancellation in patients with ADHD: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. MedRxiv. 2020. [DOI:10.1101/2020.01.13.20017335]
37. Wang CSM, Cheng KS, Tang, CH, Hou NT, Chien PF, Huang YC. 314 -Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive function in Alzheimer's dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2020;32(1):72. [DOI:10.1017/S1041610220002148]
38. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation -update 2011. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):463-92. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-2011-0618 [DOI:10.3233/rnn-2011-0618] [PMID]
39. Lawrence BJ, Gasson, N, Johnson AR, Booth L, Loftus AM. Cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation for mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Parkinsons Dis 2018:1-12. [DOI:10.1155/2018/4318475] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.