نشریه علمی پژوهشی طب انتظامی Journal of Police Medicine
Volume 13, Issue 1 (2024)
J Police Med 2024, 13(1) |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Aghdam H, Shirzad H, Shirzad O. Triage in War Zones: Ethical, Clinical, and Operational Challenges in Mass Casualty Incidents, a narrative review. J Police Med 2024; 13 (1)
URL: http://jpmed.ir/article-1-1313-en.html
URL: http://jpmed.ir/article-1-1313-en.html
1- , hamedaghdam@gmail.com
English Extended Abstract: (44 Views)
Introduction:
In war-torn areas, triage systems face challenges such as the destruction of healthcare infrastructure (72% in Gaza, 2023), resource shortages, and persistent security threats, which negatively impact their efficiency and effectiveness. This situation leads to reduced patient survival rates, ethical dilemmas, and limitations in the use of new technologies. The aim of this study was to provide evidence-based solutions to improve the management of triage systems in war-torn areas, focusing on regional differences, ethical challenges, and technological solutions in the wars in Gaza, Yemen, and Ukraine, to help increase the effectiveness, efficiency, and equity of health service delivery in humanitarian crises.
Methods:
This narrative review was conducted by analyzing secondary data from the wars in Gaza, Yemen, and Ukraine (2015-2024). Quantitative data (survival rates, triage time) were extracted from WHO/ICRC reports and PubMed articles. Qualitative data included interviews with medical staff and content analysis of field reports. New technologies (artificial intelligence, VR) were assessed using purposive sampling. Analyses were conducted using a SWOT framework and a descriptive-analytical approach.
Findings:
Survival rates in Ukraine (78.5%) were higher than in Gaza (51.2%), which is due to better infrastructure and international cooperation. Local systems in Yemen need standardization. Ethical dilemmas, such as decision-making based on the chance of survival, were reported in 68% of cases. The use of AI in Ukraine reduced triage time by 40%, but in Gaza, it was limited due to power outages. It was suggested to develop protocols based on START and TCCC and to establish strategic reserves of triage kits.
Conclusion:
Improving triage systems requires multifaceted policymaking, including improving infrastructure, utilizing technology, and resolving ethical dilemmas. International cooperation and standardization of indigenous systems are essential. New technologies such as artificial intelligence and VR play an important role in reducing operation times and training forces. The development of comprehensive protocols and strategic reserves should be on the agenda, and the future should focus on the impacts of climate change and the ethical aspects of new technologies.
In war-torn areas, triage systems face challenges such as the destruction of healthcare infrastructure (72% in Gaza, 2023), resource shortages, and persistent security threats, which negatively impact their efficiency and effectiveness. This situation leads to reduced patient survival rates, ethical dilemmas, and limitations in the use of new technologies. The aim of this study was to provide evidence-based solutions to improve the management of triage systems in war-torn areas, focusing on regional differences, ethical challenges, and technological solutions in the wars in Gaza, Yemen, and Ukraine, to help increase the effectiveness, efficiency, and equity of health service delivery in humanitarian crises.
Methods:
This narrative review was conducted by analyzing secondary data from the wars in Gaza, Yemen, and Ukraine (2015-2024). Quantitative data (survival rates, triage time) were extracted from WHO/ICRC reports and PubMed articles. Qualitative data included interviews with medical staff and content analysis of field reports. New technologies (artificial intelligence, VR) were assessed using purposive sampling. Analyses were conducted using a SWOT framework and a descriptive-analytical approach.
Findings:
Survival rates in Ukraine (78.5%) were higher than in Gaza (51.2%), which is due to better infrastructure and international cooperation. Local systems in Yemen need standardization. Ethical dilemmas, such as decision-making based on the chance of survival, were reported in 68% of cases. The use of AI in Ukraine reduced triage time by 40%, but in Gaza, it was limited due to power outages. It was suggested to develop protocols based on START and TCCC and to establish strategic reserves of triage kits.
Conclusion:
Improving triage systems requires multifaceted policymaking, including improving infrastructure, utilizing technology, and resolving ethical dilemmas. International cooperation and standardization of indigenous systems are essential. New technologies such as artificial intelligence and VR play an important role in reducing operation times and training forces. The development of comprehensive protocols and strategic reserves should be on the agenda, and the future should focus on the impacts of climate change and the ethical aspects of new technologies.
Keywords: 1. Military Triage 2. Conflict Zones Health Crisis 3. Emerging Technologies &, AI 4. Medical Ethics &, Standardization 5. Disaster Management &, Relief Strategies
Article Type: Narrative Review |
Subject:
Police Medicine Emergencies
Received: 2025/07/13 | Accepted: 2025/07/30 | Published: 2024/05/5
Received: 2025/07/13 | Accepted: 2025/07/30 | Published: 2024/05/5
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |