logo
Volume 13, Issue 1 (2024)                   J Police Med 2024, 13(1) | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.BMSU.REC.1401 . 016


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

mashaekhian M, ebadi A, daneshbar S. Investigating the Quality of Life in Patients with Lumbar Spine Pain based on the Type of Treatment among Military Personnel Referring to Valiasr Hospital. J Police Med 2024; 13 (1) : e4
URL: http://jpmed.ir/article-1-1264-en.html
1- Emergency Department, Valiasr Faraja Hospital, Tehran, Iran , mmashayekhian@yahoo.com
2- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Research Center for Trauma in Police Operations, Directorate of Health, Rescue and Treatment, Police Headquarter, Tehran, Iran
English Extended Abstract:   (76 Views)
Aims: According to the type of activity in different parts of the work environment, military employees are subject to burnout and suffering from back pain. Considering its importance, this study evaluated the quality of life in patients with lumbar spine pain based on the type of treatment (surgical and non-surgical) in military personnel referred to Valiasr Hospital.
Materials and Methods: In this cohort study, the samples were selected from among the military personnel patients who were referred to the physical medicine clinic, pain clinic, and spine surgery clinic of Valiasr Hospital in 2021 with chronic back pain. Sampling was done non-randomly and among the eligible patients and after obtaining the patients' consent, they were included in the study. The samples were divided into two non-surgical treatment groups and a surgical group, and at the beginning of the research and also one year after the start of the treatment, quality of life, pain intensity, and Oswestry questionnaires were completed by the researcher and through interviews with the patients. Data were analyzed by paired and independent t-tests, Wilcoxon, ANOVA, and Kruskal-Wallis.
Findings: In this study, 230 patients with an average age of 43.3±8.2 years were included in the study. In terms of gender ratio, the percentage of patients were female and 84% were male. Also, the average height in the patients of both studied groups
was 169.72±8.60 cm and the average weight in both groups was 74.25±8.330 kg, which statistically did not have a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.537). In terms of the indicators examined in the treatment of patients, the quality of life in both groups increased statistically significantly after treatment, and this increase was greater in the non-surgical group than in the surgical group. Also, both groups had a decrease in disability and pain intensity, which was statistically significant (p<0.001). By comparing the amount of changes between the two groups, it was found that the decrease in disability and increase in quality of life was greater in the non-surgical group and the reduction in pain score was greater in the surgical group (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Both surgical and non-surgical treatment methods are significantly effective in improving the performance of patients with chronic back pain, but non-surgical treatments are more effective than surgical treatments in improving the quality of life and reducing pain in patients with chronic back pain.
Article number: e4
Full-Text [PDF 584 kb]   (49 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Police Related Trauma
Received: 2024/05/19 | Accepted: 2024/08/20 | Published: 2024/09/16

References
1. Freburger JK, Holmes GM, Robert A. The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(3):251-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2008.543 [DOI:10.1001%2Farchinternmed.2008.543]
2. Low Back Pain Fact Sheet.. NIH: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; 2015.
3. Deyo M, James N. Low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(5):363-70. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200102013440508 [DOI:10.1056/NEJM200102013440508]
4. Kuijpers T, van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein S. A systematic review on the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for chronic non-specific low-back pain. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(1):40-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1541-4 [DOI:10.1007%2Fs00586-010-1541-4]
5. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality EH, Program. Noninvasive treatments for low back pain: current state of the evidence. Clinician summary.: Rockville, Md.: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016.
6. Vicker A, Zollman C. ABC of complementary medicine. Massage therapies. BMJ. 1999;319(7219):1254-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7219.1254 [DOI:10.1136%2Fbmj.319.7219.1254]
7. FurlanAD, GiraldoM, Baskwill A, IrvinE, ImamuraM. Massagefor low-backpain(Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(9):7-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001929.pub3 [DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd001929.pub3]
8. To D, Rezai M, Murnaghan K, Cancelliere C. Risk factors for low back pain in active military personnel: a systematic review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2021;29(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00409-x [DOI:10.1186%2Fs12998-021-00409-x]
9. Boroojeni S, Mehrafzoon N, Mashalchi H. The health quality assessment patients whit Lumbar disc herniation, before and after Herniated Lumbar Disc surgery. RJMS. 2020;27(20):176-85. http://rjms/
10. Montazeri A, Goshtasbi A, Vahdaninia M, Barbara G. The short form health survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res. 2006:49-56. [DOI:10.1007/s11136-004-1014-5]
11. Samadi H, Rajabi R, Minoonejad H, Shahi Y, F. S. Comparison of pain, disability and psychological effects of chronic low back pain in women before and after a period of stabilization exercise. Olympic. 2011;50:125-134. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/864380/
12. Matarán-Peñarrocha GA, Lara Palomo IC, Antequera Soler E, Gil-Martínez E, Fernández-Sánchez M, Aguilar-Ferrándiz ME, et al. Comparison of efficacy of a supervised versus non-supervised physical therapy exercise program on the pain, functionality and quality of life of patients with non-specific chronic low-back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(7):948-59. [DOI:10.1177/0269215520927076]
13. Lara-Palomo IC, Antequera-Soler E, Matarán-Peñarrocha GA, Fernández-Sánchez M, García-López H, Castro-Sánchez AM, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of an e-health program versus a home rehabilitation program in patients with chronic low back pain: a double blind randomized controlled trial. Digital Health. 2022;8. [DOI:10.1177/20552076221074482]
14. Brox JI, Nygaard ØP, Holm I, Keller A, Ingebrigtsen T, Reikerås O. Four-year follow-up of surgical versus non-surgical therapy for chronic low back pain. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(9):1643-8. [DOI:10.1136/ard.2009.108902]
15. Shahrokhi M, Ebrahimi H, Balouchi R, Eslami R. Effect of 6-week Pilates exercises on low back pain, abdominal and back muscle endurance in patients with chronic low back pain due to disc herniation. Razi J Med Sci. 2015;22(135):9-17. https://smj.ssrc.ac.ir/article_574.html
16. Lotfi HR, Ebrhimi Atri A, Hashemi Javaheri SAA, K. N. The effect of six weeks supine movement in water on the pain and disability in men with chronic low back pain due to lumbar disc herniation. Mashhad Rehabil J. 2015;5(1):14-22. https://smj.ssrc.ac.ir/article_574.html
17. Esmaili M, Tahan N, Miri M , Montazeri A. Factors affecting the results of lumbar discectomy. Tehran Univ Med J. 2017;75(2):126-34. http://tumj.tums.ac.ir/article-1-8039-en.html

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.